1. AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force. American  Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical  practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocrine Practice Vol 13 (Suppl 1), May/June 2007.

2.  American Diabetes Association.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2007. Diabetes Care, Vol 30 (Suppl 1), January 2007.

3.  Richardson, T, Weiss, M, Thomas P, Kerr, D. Day after the night before: Influence of evening alcohol on risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28 (7):1801-1802.

4.  CDC Growth Charts: United States.  Developed by the National Center for Health Statistics in collaboration with the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2000).

5. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care 1999; 22(4): 623-624.

6. Wilson, PWF, Meigs, JB, Sullivan, L, Fox, CS, Nathan, DM, Ralph, B, D’Agostino, RB Sr. Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: The Framingham offspring study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(10):1068-1074.

7.  Dekker, JM, Balkau, B. Counterpoint: Impaired Fasting Glucose: the case against the new American Diabetes Association guidelines. Diabetes Care 2006; 29(5):1173-1175.

8.  Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.  Reduction in the Incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6): 393-403.

9.  Stone, ML, Craig ME, Chan, AK, Lee, JW,  Verge, CF, Donaghue, KC.  Natural history and risk factors for microalbuminuria in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a longitudinal study.  Diabetes Care  2006; 29(9): 2072-2077.

10. Members of the professional practice committee. Summary of revisions for the 2007 clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care 2007; 30 (Suppl 1).

11. The diabetes prevention program research group. Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes  Diabetes Care 2005; 28(1): 138-144.

12.  Adler, AI, Turner, RC. The diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(4): 543-545.

13. Lindstrom, J, Tuomilehto, J.  The Diabetes Risk Score, A practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk.  Diabetes Care 2003; 26(3): 725-731.

14. American Diabetes Association. Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(3): 381-389.

15. Franciosi, M, DeBerardis, G, Rossi, MC, et al. Use of the diabetes risk score for opportunistic screening of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the IGLOO study. Diabetes Care 2005; 28(5):1187–1194.

16. National Diabetes Statistics, 2007. National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health

17. Brown, WJ, Burton, NW, Rowan, PJ. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33(5):404-411.

18. Esposito, K, Ciotola, M, Giugliano, D. Mediterraean diet and the metabolic syndrome. Mol Nutr Food Res 2007; 51(10):1268-74.

19. Blonde, L, Karter, AJ. Current evidence regarding the value of self-monitored blood glucose testing. Am J Med 2005; 118(Suppl 9A): 20S-26S.

20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP), 2007. MMWR 2007; 56(RR06):1-54.

21. Sigal, RJ, Kenny, GP, Wasserman, DH, et al. Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:1433-1438.

22. Pradhan, AD, Rifai, N, Buring, JE, Ridker, PM. Hemoglobin A1c predicts diabetes but not cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic women. Am J Med 2007; 120(8):720-727.

23. Wild, S, Roglic, G, Green, A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1047.

24. Wang, Y, Rimm, EB, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81(3):555-563.

The Health Score was created by a team of medical experts at WebMD to help patients better understand how factors related to diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring can affect clinical outcomes.

A Type 2 Diabetes Health Score of

• 30-40
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range generally reflects careful attention to the necessary lifestyle choices needed to minimize complications from diabetes. 
• 10-30
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range generally means the individual is giving attention to the lifestyle choices that are necessary to avoid complications, but more work is needed.
• Less than 10
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range means there is a great deal of benefit to be gained from a more disciplined and focused approach to managing the disease.

The Health Score is presented for general information purposes only and may not be accurate for everyone with diabetes. It is not intended to be a substitute or replacement for an evaluation by a qualified medical provider. Only your doctor can determine which diagnostic procedures and medical treatments are right for you. Symptoms of type 2 diabetes can be highly variable. The Type 2 Diabetes Health Score is based only on the current answers provided and may vary widely between Type 2 Diabetes Health Check sessions.

The Type 2 Diabetes Well-being Score was created by a team of medical experts at WebMD to help patients examine how personal attitudes, beliefs, and support from others may affect their diabetes and overall quality of life.

A Well-being score of:

• 30-40
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range generally reflects a good attitude, a willingness to make sometimes difficult lifestyle choices, and a minimal impact of diabetes on their overall well-being.
• 10-30
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range generally reflects a less than total commitment to the pursuit of better health, with moderate impact on their overall well-being.
• Less than 10
  • For those diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a score in this range generally reflects someone who has not made a commitment to the lifestyle changes needed to improve diabetes management. The individual’s well-being has also been adversely impacted.

The Knowledge Score was created by a team of medical experts at WebMD to help patients make better medical decisions through a process of self-testing supported by tailored information to fill critical knowledge gaps.

A Knowledge score of:

• 20
• • Generally reflects an excellent overall understanding of diabetes.
• 5-15
• • Generally reflects adequate understanding of diabetes.
• 5
• • Generally reflects someone who needs learn more about diabetes to manage the disease effectively.