Show ratings & reviews for

4.7 Overall Rating

Effectiveness

Ease of Use

Satisfaction

Most voted positive review

3 People found this comment helpful

I used this treatment in combination with Rituxan for my stage 4 follicular non hodgkins lymphoma. I was given this as first line treatment and had awesome results. I am now 5 years in remission and have been discharged by my oncologist as all PET and CT scans have been unchanged and no return of disease. The only down side was my counts dropped very low and I had to have Procrit shots to increa...

Shared reviews and ratings

Anonymous | 45-54 | Male | On medication for less than 1 month | Patient
12/29/2015
Condition: Follicular Lymphoma
Overall rating 5.0
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I was in bad shape in 2006. Relapsed from initial treatment in 2000. Did Zevelin in 2006. Still here going into 2016.

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.
Breedzfree | 35-44 | Female | On medication for 1 to less than 2 years | Patient
5/13/2011
Condition: Follicular Lymphoma
Overall rating 4.3
Effectiveness
Ease of Use
Satisfaction

I used this treatment in combination with Rituxan for my stage 4 follicular non hodgkins lymphoma. I was given this as first line treatment and had awesome results. I am now 5 years in remission and have been discharged by my oncologist as all PET and CT scans have been unchanged and no return of disease. The only down side was my counts dropped very low and I had to have Procrit shots to increase the levels. I had more trouble with the Rituxan than the Zevalin, Rituxan infusion had to be done slow 5-6 hours due to me having reaction to the med throughout my treatment, but I just fell asleep during the treatment and went home fine afterward. I would recommend this treatment without any reservations.Read More Read Less

Report this postFill 3Created with Sketch.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON WEBMD

The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions.

Read More